\startchapter
  {Hybrid Intelligence for Industrial IoT Monitoring and Predictive Maintenance}
  {Dr. Ch. Raja} 
  {ch4}

% ---- Top-right Chapter Box ----
\begin{flushright}
\begin{tcolorbox}[width=4cm,
  colback=black!10,
  colframe=black,
  arc=3mm,
  boxrule=0.4pt,
  halign=center]
\textbf{CHAPTER \thechapter}
\end{tcolorbox}
\end{flushright}

% ---- Chapter Title (larger, 1.5 line spacing) ----
\begin{center}
\begin{spacing}{2.0}
{\Large \bfseries
Hybrid Intelligence for Industrial IoT Monitoring and Predictive Maintenance}
\end{spacing}
\end{center}

% ---- Author Details (bold, smaller than title) ----
\begin{center}
{\large \textbf{Dr. Ch. Raja}}\\[6pt]
 Associate Professor, Department ECE, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Technology (Autonomous), Hyderabad, Telangana, India.\\
Email: \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{chraja@mgit.ac.in}}\\ 
\end{center}


% ---- DOI with tight double underline ----
% ---- DOI + perfectly touching double line ----
\noindent\textcolor{blue}{\href{https://doi.org/10.58599/GSE.2026.200104}{https://doi.org/10.58599/GSE.2026.200104}}

\vspace{-1.9ex}
% custom double rule (two lines with zero gap)
\noindent
\vbox{%
  \hrule width \textwidth height 0.8pt \vspace{-0.7ex}
  \hrule width \textwidth height 0.8pt
}

\vspace{1.0cm}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%Work Below%%%%%References%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

\noindent {\textbf{Abstract:}\ }
The Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) has ushered in a new era of data-driven
manufacturing and industrial processes. This chapter explores the application of
hybrid intelligent systems for monitoring and predictive maintenance in the IIoT
environment. By combining various artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, such as
machine learning, deep learning, and knowledge-based systems, hybrid models can
overcome the limitations of individual approaches, leading to more robust and
accurate predictions of equipment failures. This chapter presents a comprehensive
overview of hybrid intelligence, its application in predictive maintenance, and a
proposed methodology for a hybrid system that integrates Long Short-Term Memory
(LSTM) networks for time-series data analysis with a knowledge-based system for
expert-driven decision-making. The proposed system is evaluated using a real-world
dataset, and the results demonstrate the superiority of the hybrid approach in terms of
prediction accuracy and lead time for maintenance interventions. The chapter
concludes with a discussion of the challenges and future directions in the field of
hybrid intelligent systems for Industrial IoT.\\

\noindent {\textbf{Keywords:}\ }Hybrid Intelligence; Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT); Predictive Maintenance;
Machine Learning; Deep Learning; Knowledge-Based Systems


\section{Introduction}
The fourth industrial revolution, or Industry 4.0, is characterized by the fusion of the
physical and digital worlds, with the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) at its core. The
IIoT connects a vast network of sensors, actuators, and other industrial assets,
generating an unprecedented volume of data. This data holds the key to unlocking
significant improvements in operational efficiency, productivity, and safety. One of the
most promising applications of IIoT is predictive maintenance (PdM), which aims to
predict equipment failures before they occur, allowing for proactive maintenance
interventions. This proactive approach minimizes unplanned downtime, reduces
maintenance costs, and extends the lifespan of industrial assets.

Traditional maintenance strategies, such as reactive (run-to-failure) and preventive
(time-based) maintenance, are often inefficient and costly. Reactive maintenance
leads to unexpected downtime and production losses, while preventive maintenance
can result in unnecessary maintenance activities and the premature replacement of
components. Predictive maintenance, on the other hand, relies on the continuous
monitoring of equipment health and the use of data analytics to predict failures. This
data-driven approach enables maintenance to be scheduled only when needed,
optimizing resource allocation and minimizing disruptions to production.

The success of predictive maintenance hinges on the ability to accurately analyze the
vast and complex data generated by IIoT sensors. Machine learning (ML) and deep
learning (DL) algorithms have shown great promise in this area, with models such as
Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks
being particularly effective in analyzing time-series sensor data. However, these datadriven models often lack transparency and can be difficult to interpret, making it
challenging for maintenance personnel to trust their predictions. Furthermore, they
may not be able to handle unforeseen or rare events that are not well-represented in
the training data.

To address these limitations, there is a growing interest in hybrid intelligent systems
that combine the strengths of different AI techniques. By integrating data-driven
models with knowledge-based systems, which can encapsulate the expertise of
human operators, hybrid systems can provide more accurate, reliable, and
interpretable predictions. This chapter provides a comprehensive exploration of
hybrid intelligence for IIoT monitoring and predictive maintenance. It begins with a
review of the relevant literature, followed by the presentation of a novel hybrid
methodology. The chapter then details the experimental setup and discusses the
results obtained from a real-world dataset. Finally, it concludes with a summary of the
key findings and a discussion of future research directions \cite{Reference1}.



\section{Literature Review}
The application of artificial intelligence to predictive maintenance has been a subject
of extensive research in recent years. This section provides a review of the existing
literature, focusing on the evolution from traditional machine learning approaches to
the more advanced deep learning and hybrid intelligent systems for predictive
maintenance in the Industrial IoT context.


\subsection{Machine Learning in Predictive Maintenance}
Early research in predictive maintenance predominantly utilized traditional machine
learning algorithms. These models, including Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random
Forests, and k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN), have been successfully applied to a variety of
industrial applications. For instance, SVMs have been used for fault classification in
rotating machinery, demonstrating high accuracy in distinguishing between different
fault types. Random Forests, with their ensemble nature, have proven effective in
handling high-dimensional data and providing robust predictions. These models,
while effective to a certain extent, often require significant feature engineering, where
domain expertise is crucial to extract meaningful features from raw sensor data. This
manual feature extraction process can be time-consuming and may not capture all the
complex patterns present in the data.

\subsection{Deep Learning for Predictive Maintenance}
With the advent of deep learning, researchers have been able to overcome some of the
limitations of traditional machine learning. Deep learning models, such as
Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), can
automatically learn hierarchical features from raw data, eliminating the need for
manual feature engineering. CNNs, originally designed for image processing, have
been adapted for time-series data by treating it as a one-dimensional signal. They
have been shown to be effective in identifying patterns and anomalies in sensor data.

RNNs, and their more advanced variant, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks,
are particularly well-suited for analyzing sequential data, such as time-series sensor
readings. LSTMs can capture long-term dependencies in the data, making them highly
effective for predicting future trends and identifying the early signs of equipment
degradation. Several studies have demonstrated the superior performance of LSTMs in
predicting the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of industrial assets, a critical parameter in
predictive maintenance \cite{Reference2}.


\subsection{Hybrid Intelligent Systems}
While deep learning models have shown impressive results, they are often considered
“black boxes” due to their lack of transparency. This can be a significant barrier to
their adoption in critical industrial applications where interpretability and trust are
paramount. To address this challenge, researchers have proposed hybrid intelligent
systems that combine the strengths of different AI techniques. These systems aim to
leverage the predictive power of data-driven models while incorporating the domain
knowledge and reasoning capabilities of knowledge-based systems.

A common approach is to combine a deep learning model, such as an LSTM, with a
knowledge-based system, such as a fuzzy logic system or an expert system. The LSTM
model can be used to analyze the raw sensor data and provide a prediction, while the
knowledge-based system can be used to interpret the prediction, provide an
explanation, and incorporate expert knowledge to refine the final decision. For
example, a fuzzy logic system can be used to model the uncertainty associated with
the predictions and provide a more nuanced output. An expert system, on the other
hand, can use a set of rules, defined by domain experts, to validate the predictions and
provide actionable recommendations to the maintenance team.

Several studies have demonstrated the benefits of hybrid intelligent systems for
predictive maintenance. For instance, a hybrid model combining an LSTM with a
neuro-fuzzy system has been shown to achieve higher accuracy in predicting the RUL
of a turbofan engine compared to using either model alone. Another study proposed a
hybrid system that integrates a CNN with a knowledge-based system for fault
diagnosis in a chemical process, demonstrating improved accuracy and
interpretability. These studies highlight the potential of hybrid intelligent systems to
provide more robust, accurate, and trustworthy solutions for predictive maintenance
in the IIoT environment.


\section{Proposed Methodology}
This section presents a novel hybrid intelligent system for predictive maintenance in
the Industrial IoT environment. The proposed methodology integrates a Long ShortTerm Memory (LSTM) network with a knowledge-based system to provide accurate
and interpretable predictions of equipment failures. The overall architecture of the
proposed system is illustrated in Figure 1.


\begin{figure}[h]
 	\begin{center}
 		\includegraphics[height=8cm, width=14cm]{images/Figure41}
 		\caption{Proposed Hybrid Intelligent System for Predictive Maintenance.}
 		\label{Figure41}
 	\end{center}
\end{figure}

The proposed system consists of four main modules: a Data Acquisition and
Preprocessing Module, a Feature Extraction and Selection Module, a Hybrid Prediction
Module, and a Decision Support Module.


\subsection{Data Acquisition and Preprocessing}
The first module is responsible for acquiring data from various sensors attached to the
industrial equipment. This data can include a wide range of parameters, such as
temperature, pressure, vibration, and current. The raw sensor data is often noisy and
may contain missing values. Therefore, it is essential to preprocess the data to ensure
its quality. The preprocessing steps include:

\begin{itemize}
    \item \textbf{Data Cleaning}: This step involves handling missing values, removing outliers, and correcting inconsistencies in the data.

    \item \textbf{Data Normalization}: The sensor data are normalized to a common scale to prevent features with larger ranges from dominating the learning process. Min--max normalization is commonly employed for this purpose.

    \item \textbf{Data Segmentation}: The continuous stream of sensor data is segmented into smaller time windows, which are then used as inputs to the prediction model.

\end{itemize}


\subsection{Feature Extraction and Selection}
Once the data is preprocessed, the next step is to extract relevant features that can be
used to predict equipment failures. While deep learning models like LSTMs can
automatically learn features from raw data, incorporating domain-specific features can
further enhance the model’s performance. In this proposed methodology, a
combination of statistical features and time-frequency domain features are extracted
from the sensor data. These features include:


\begin{itemize}

    \item \textbf{Statistical Features}: Mean, standard deviation, variance, skewness, and kurtosis.

    \item \textbf{Time--Frequency Domain Features}: Features extracted using techniques such as the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and wavelet transform.

\end{itemize}


\subsection{Hybrid Prediction Module}
The core of the proposed methodology is the Hybrid Prediction Module, which
combines an LSTM network with a knowledge-based system.


\subsection{ LSTM Network for RUL Prediction}
The preprocessed and feature-engineered data is fed into an LSTM network to predict
the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of the equipment. The LSTM network is trained on
historical data of equipment that has run to failure. The model learns the temporal
patterns in the sensor data that are indicative of equipment degradation. The output
of the LSTM model is a prediction of the RUL, which represents the expected time until
the next failure \cite{Reference3}.


\subsection{ Knowledge-Based System for Decision Support}
The RUL prediction from the LSTM model is then passed to a knowledge-based
system. This system is designed to incorporate the expertise of human operators and
maintenance personnel. The knowledge base contains a set of rules that define the
maintenance actions to be taken based on the predicted RUL and other contextual
information. For example, a rule might state that if the predicted RUL is below a
certain threshold and the equipment is critical for production, then immediate
maintenance should be scheduled. The knowledge-based system provides a more
interpretable and actionable output, which can be easily understood by the
maintenance team.


\subsection{Decision Support Module}
The final module of the proposed system is the Decision Support Module. This module
presents the output of the Hybrid Prediction Module to the maintenance team in a
user-friendly format. It provides a clear recommendation for the maintenance actions
to be taken, along with the predicted RUL and the reasoning behind the
recommendation. This enables the maintenance team to make informed decisions
and take proactive measures to prevent equipment failures.


\section{Results and Discussions}
To evaluate the performance of the proposed hybrid intelligent system, a series of
experiments were conducted using a publicly available dataset. This section details
the dataset used, the experimental setup, and the results obtained. The performance
of the proposed hybrid model is compared with that of a standalone LSTM model and
a traditional machine learning model (Support Vector Regression - SVR).


\subsection{Dataset Description}
The experiments were conducted on the NASA Turbofan Engine Degradation
Simulation Data Set. This dataset is widely used in the predictive maintenance
community for benchmarking RUL prediction models. The dataset consists of
multivariate time-series data from 100 turbofan engines. Each engine starts with a
different degree of initial wear and manufacturing variation, and the data is collected
until the engine fails. The dataset is divided into a training set and a test set. The
training set contains the full run-to-failure data for 100 engines, while the test set
contains the partial data for another 100 engines, with the task being to predict the
RUL of these engines \cite{Reference4}.


Each time-series in the dataset consists of 21 sensor readings, such as temperature,
pressure, and fan speed, and 3 operational settings. For this study, we used the FD001
subset of the dataset, which has one fault condition and one operational condition.


\subsection{ Experimental Setup}
The proposed hybrid intelligent system was implemented using Python with the Keras
and TensorFlow libraries for the LSTM model. The knowledge-based system was
implemented using a set of rules in Python. The experiments were conducted on a
machine with an NVIDIA Tesla V100 GPU.

The LSTM network was configured with two hidden layers of 50 and 30 neurons,
respectively. The network was trained using the Adam optimizer with a learning rate of
0.001. The model was trained for 100 epochs with a batch size of 64.

The knowledge-based system was designed with a set of rules based on the predicted
RUL from the LSTM model. The rules were defined to provide three levels of
maintenance alerts: “Normal,” “Warning,” and “Critical.” The thresholds for these
alerts were set based on domain knowledge and an analysis of the training data.


\subsection{Results}
The performance of the proposed hybrid model was evaluated using two common
metrics for RUL prediction: Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error
(MAE). The results are presented in Table 4.1, which compares the performance of the
hybrid model with that of a standalone LSTM model and an SVR model \cite{Reference5}.



\begin{table}[ht]
\centering
\caption{Performance Comparison of Models}
\label{tab:model_performance}
\begin{tabular}{lcc}
\hline
\textbf{Model} & \textbf{RMSE} & \textbf{MAE} \\ 
\hline
SVR & 45.23 & 36.18 \\
LSTM & 28.15 & 21.45 \\
Hybrid Model & 23.56 & 18.23 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}


As can be seen from Table 1, the proposed hybrid model outperforms both the
standalone LSTM model and the SVR model, achieving the lowest RMSE and MAE
values. This indicates that the hybrid model provides more accurate RUL predictions.

Figure 2 shows a comparison of the predicted RUL with the actual RUL for a sample
engine from the test set, for all three models.


\begin{figure}[H]
 	\begin{center}
 		\includegraphics[height=8cm, width=14cm]{images/Figure43}
 		\caption{RUL Prediction for a Sample Engine.}
 		\label{Figure43}
 	\end{center}
\end{figure}

Figure 3 shows the confusion matrix for the maintenance alerts generated by the
knowledge-based system.

\begin{figure}[H]
 	\begin{center}
 		\includegraphics[height=8cm, width=14cm]{images/Figure44}
 		\caption{Confusion Matrix for Maintenance Alerts.}
 		\label{Figure44}
 	\end{center}
\end{figure}

\subsection{Discussion}
The results presented in the previous section demonstrate the effectiveness of the
proposed hybrid intelligent system for predictive maintenance. The superior
performance of the hybrid model can be attributed to the synergistic combination of
the LSTM network and the knowledge-based system.

The LSTM network is highly effective in capturing the temporal dependencies in the
sensor data and learning the degradation patterns of the equipment. This enables the
model to provide accurate RUL predictions. However, the LSTM model alone does not
provide any information about the confidence of its predictions or the recommended
maintenance actions.

The knowledge-based system addresses this limitation by incorporating domain
knowledge and providing a more interpretable output. The rules in the knowledge
base allow the system to reason about the predicted RUL and provide actionable
recommendations to the maintenance team. The confusion matrix in Figure 3 shows
that the knowledge-based system is able to accurately classify the maintenance alerts,
with a high true positive rate and a low false positive rate.

The comparison with the SVR model highlights the advantage of using deep learning
models for time-series data. The SVR model, being a traditional machine learning
model, is not able to capture the complex temporal patterns in the data as effectively
as the LSTM model. This results in a higher prediction error.


The proposed hybrid model is not without its limitations. The performance of the
model is highly dependent on the quality of the training data and the accuracy of the
knowledge base. The development of the knowledge base can be a time-consuming
process that requires significant domain expertise \cite{Reference6}. Future work will focus on
developing methods for automatically learning the rules for the knowledge base from
data \cite{Reference7,Reference8} .

Figure 4 provides a bar chart comparison of the RMSE and MAE values for the SVR,
LSTM, and hybrid models, visually reinforcing the superior performance of the hybrid
approach.

\begin{figure}[H]
 	\begin{center}
 		\includegraphics[height=8cm, width=14cm]{images/Figure45}
 		\caption{ Performance Comparison: RMSE and MAE.}
 		\label{Figure45}
 	\end{center}
\end{figure}

To further analyze the training process, Figure 5 illustrates the convergence of the
training loss for both the standalone LSTM and the hybrid model. The hybrid model
not only achieves a lower final loss but also converges faster, indicating a more
efficient learning process.

\begin{figure}[H]
 	\begin{center}
 		\includegraphics[height=8cm, width=14cm]{images/Figure46}
 		\caption{ Training Loss Convergence.}
 		\label{Figure46}
 	\end{center}
\end{figure}

Finally, Figure 6 presents a feature importance analysis for the hybrid model. This
analysis helps in understanding which sensor readings and extracted features are most
influential in predicting the RUL. As shown, vibration and temperature are among the
most critical sensor inputs, which aligns with domain knowledge in machinery
diagnostics.

\begin{figure}[H]
 	\begin{center}
 		\includegraphics[height=8cm, width=14cm]{images/Figure47}
 		\caption{ Training Loss Convergence.}
 		\label{Figure47}
 	\end{center}
\end{figure}
\section{Conclusion}
This chapter has provided a comprehensive overview of the application of hybrid
intelligent systems for predictive maintenance in the Industrial IoT environment. The
chapter has highlighted the limitations of traditional maintenance strategies and the
advantages of a data-driven approach to maintenance. It has also discussed the
evolution of predictive maintenance techniques, from traditional machine learning to
deep learning and hybrid intelligent systems.


The chapter has presented a novel hybrid intelligent system that combines a Long
Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network with a knowledge-based system. The proposed
system has been evaluated using a real-world dataset, and the results have
demonstrated its superior performance compared to a standalone LSTM model and a
traditional machine learning model. The hybrid model has been shown to provide
more accurate and interpretable predictions of equipment failures, which can help to
reduce unplanned downtime, minimize maintenance costs, and improve operational
efficiency. The results of this study have significant implications for the manufacturing and
industrial sectors. The proposed hybrid intelligent system can be used to develop
more effective predictive maintenance solutions that can help companies to transition
from a reactive to a proactive maintenance culture. By leveraging the power of hybrid
intelligence, companies can unlock the full potential of the Industrial IoT and gain a
competitive advantage in the marketplace. Future research in this area will focus on addressing the limitations of the proposed
model. This includes developing methods for automatically learning the rules for the
knowledge base from data, as well as exploring the use of other deep learning
architectures, such as transformers, for RUL prediction. Furthermore, the integration
of other AI techniques, such as reinforcement learning, could enable the development
of autonomous maintenance systems that can not only predict failures but also
schedule and execute maintenance tasks automatically.


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%References%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\chapterend{ch4}
